Turns Out Your Light-Up Sneakers Really Do Make You Run Faster

I’ve often wondered: do we work out harder because we’re motivated - or because we feel good in our gym gear?

It sounds flippant, but behavioural science suggests it’s not entirely superficial. In 2012, researchers at Northwestern University coined the term enclothed cognition - the idea that what we wear influences how we think and perform. In their study, participants who wore a white coat described as a “doctor’s coat” performed significantly better on attention-related tasks than those who wore the same coat labelled as a “painter’s coat.” Same garment. Different meaning. Different outcome.

Translation? Clothing carries psychological weight. And when it comes to sportswear, that weight can quite literally change how we move.

Dressing the Part (Literally)

A 2015 study published in the Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology found that participants who changed into athletic clothing reported greater motivation to exercise and were more likely to engage in physical activity than those who remained in casual wear. The clothing acted as a behavioural cue - a quiet nudge toward action.

It makes sense. The moment you lace up a performance shoe from Nike or pull on compressive leggings, you are signalling something to yourself: I am about to perform.

And identity is powerful. Research in behavioural economics consistently shows that when people adopt an identity - “I’m a runner,” “I’m an athlete,” “I train” - their behaviour begins to align with it. Sportswear, in this context, is less outfit and more affirmation.

Which begs the question: is your activewear working as hard as you are?

From Converse to Carbon Plates

At the turn of the 20th century, sportswear was practical to the point of austerity. Runners tugged on heavy wool jerseys, cyclists wore cotton knickers, and leather-soled shoes were the norm - durable, yes, but unforgiving. Movement relied on sheer grit, not design.

By the 1920s and 30s, athletic gear began to flirt with style. Canvas sneakers, most famously the humble Converse All Star, appeared on basketball courts and track fields alike. Cotton T-shirts replaced jerseys for a looser fit, and breathable fabrics started to hint at performance. Still, function often lagged behind aspiration: athletes looked the part, but comfort remained a luxury.

The 1970s and 80s brought synthetic fabrics, Lycra, and moisture-wicking innovations. Running boomed as a cultural phenomenon, aerobics filled studio floors, and bold colour-blocked tracksuits became both practical and emblematic. Suddenly, what you wore wasn’t just about moving - it was about being seen moving.

Today, sportswear exists at the intersection of psychology, engineering, and ethics. Carbon-plated running shoes shave seconds off elite times. Compression garments sculpt and support muscles, while fabrics regulate temperature and moisture. And in a nod to the planet, recycled and bio-based materials are increasingly standard. The gear that motivates you to run, lift, or stretch now does double duty: enhancing performance while reducing its footprint.

Performance by Design

It’s not just psychology at play - sportswear innovation genuinely enhances performance. Take running shoes: modern models use carbon-fibre plates, engineered foam, and precise geometry to increase energy return and reduce fatigue. A 2020 study in the British Journal of Sports Medicine found that elite runners wearing carbon-plated shoes ran up to 4% faster over 10 kilometres compared with conventional trainers. That’s seconds saved and endurance boosted - all without changing the runner’s stride consciously.

Compression, Posture, and the Confidence Loop

Then there’s fit. Compression garments have been shown in multiple studies to enhance proprioception - our awareness of body position in space. Improved proprioception can contribute to better movement efficiency and reduced muscle oscillation during activity.

But beyond biomechanics, there’s something subtler happening.

Well-fitted sportswear improves posture. Improved posture is associated with increased confidence and reduced cortisol levels. A 2010 study from Harvard researchers found that adopting expansive, upright postures increased feelings of power and risk tolerance.

So when body-sculpting bike shorts encourage you to stand taller, that physical adjustment may initiate a psychological loop: stand taller → feel stronger → perform better. It’s difficult to quantify in kilometres or kilograms. But anyone who has ever changed outfits mid-morning and suddenly felt capable of reorganising their entire life understands the phenomenon.

Sportswear as Social Signal

Sportswear also exists in a cultural ecosystem. Athleisure now represents a multibillion-dollar global market, and its dominance suggests something deeper than comfort. Wearing performance brands in daily life signals alignment with discipline, wellness, and self-optimisation. It says, I move. Even if, on that particular day, you absolutely do not.

This signalling effect feeds back into behaviour. Identity theory suggests that when individuals publicly adopt a role, they are more likely to behave consistently with it to avoid cognitive dissonance. In other words: if you dress like someone who trains, you are statistically more likely to train.

Which makes activewear less indulgence and more behavioural strategy.

So… Is It the Shoes?

Sportswear will not replace training. No fabric can compensate for lack of sleep or a skipped program. But dismissing the psychological dimension would be naïve.

Clothing influences cognition. Cognition influences behaviour. Behaviour compounds.

Perhaps the reason that new leggings feel like a fresh start is because, neurologically, they are. They signal a shift. A reset. A version of yourself who shows up differently.

And maybe that’s the real performance technology - not carbon plates or moisture-wicking yarns, but the recalibration of identity. Sometimes the difference between stopping and continuing is a story we tell ourselves. Sometimes that story begins with what we put on.

The views, information, and opinions expressed in this article are solely my own and do not reflect the official policy or position of my employer, its parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, or any other organisation or entity with which I am associated.

Any content published here is not endorsed, reviewed, or approved by my employer. All information shared is based on my personal experience and understanding. While I strive for accuracy and currency in all content, I make no representations as to the completeness, reliability, or accuracy of this information.